Health app policy: international comparison of nine countries' approaches

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 747 KB, PDF document

  • Anna Essen
  • Ariel D. Stern
  • Haase, Christoffer Bjerre
  • Josip Car
  • Felix Greaves
  • Dragana Paparova
  • Steven Vandeput
  • Rik Wehrens
  • David W. Bates

An abundant and growing supply of digital health applications (apps) exists in the commercial tech-sector, which can be bewildering for clinicians, patients, and payers. A growing challenge for the health care system is therefore to facilitate the identification of safe and effective apps for health care practitioners and patients to generate the most health benefit as well as guide payer coverage decisions. Nearly all developed countries are attempting to define policy frameworks to improve decision-making, patient care, and health outcomes in this context. This study compares the national policy approaches currently in development/use for health apps in nine countries. We used secondary data, combined with a detailed review of policy and regulatory documents, and interviews with key individuals and experts in the field of digital health policy to collect data about implemented and planned policies and initiatives. We found that most approaches aim for centralized pipelines for health app approvals, although some countries are adding decentralized elements. While the countries studied are taking diverse paths, there is nevertheless broad, international convergence in terms of requirements in the areas of transparency, health content, interoperability, and privacy and security. The sheer number of apps on the market in most countries represents a challenge for clinicians and patients. Our analyses of the relevant policies identified challenges in areas such as reimbursement, safety, and privacy and suggest that more regulatory work is needed in the areas of operationalization, implementation and international transferability of approvals. Cross-national efforts are needed around regulation and for countries to realize the benefits of these technologies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number31
Journalnpj Digital Medicine
Volume5
Issue number1
Number of pages10
ISSN2398-6352
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 301624909