The life and death of confidentiality: a historical analysis of the flows of patient information
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
The life and death of confidentiality : a historical analysis of the flows of patient information. / Wadmann, Sarah; Hartlev, Mette; Hoeyer, Klaus.
In: BioSocieties, Vol. 18, 2023, p. 282–307.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The life and death of confidentiality
T2 - a historical analysis of the flows of patient information
AU - Wadmann, Sarah
AU - Hartlev, Mette
AU - Hoeyer, Klaus
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Health data can contain sensitive information. People who consult a doctor seek help on issues that matter to them: they typically expect some form of confidentiality. However, the notion and practices of confidentiality have changed dramatically over time. In this article, we trace the history of confidentiality in the Danish healthcare system, which has one of the world’s most integrated patient information infrastructures. Building on an analysis of legal and political documents dating back to the late seventeenth century, we show that confidentiality originated as a social phenomenon that helped build trust in healthcare professionals and gradually developed into an idiom of citizens rights. Lately, confidentiality has given way to more technocratic forms of data protection. As the political, legal and technological reality, which the idea of confidentiality once referred to, has radically changed, we argue that confidentiality has become what Ulrik Beck has called a ‘zombie category’—a notion that lives on even if its content has passed away. If confidentiality has become a zombie concept, we suggest it is time to discuss what may take its place so that patient interests are protected in the current political economy of health data
AB - Health data can contain sensitive information. People who consult a doctor seek help on issues that matter to them: they typically expect some form of confidentiality. However, the notion and practices of confidentiality have changed dramatically over time. In this article, we trace the history of confidentiality in the Danish healthcare system, which has one of the world’s most integrated patient information infrastructures. Building on an analysis of legal and political documents dating back to the late seventeenth century, we show that confidentiality originated as a social phenomenon that helped build trust in healthcare professionals and gradually developed into an idiom of citizens rights. Lately, confidentiality has given way to more technocratic forms of data protection. As the political, legal and technological reality, which the idea of confidentiality once referred to, has radically changed, we argue that confidentiality has become what Ulrik Beck has called a ‘zombie category’—a notion that lives on even if its content has passed away. If confidentiality has become a zombie concept, we suggest it is time to discuss what may take its place so that patient interests are protected in the current political economy of health data
KW - Confidentiality
KW - Datafication
KW - Digitalization
KW - Information technology
KW - Secrecy
KW - Zombie categories
U2 - 10.1057/s41292-021-00269-x
DO - 10.1057/s41292-021-00269-x
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35126615
VL - 18
SP - 282
EP - 307
JO - BioSocieties
JF - BioSocieties
SN - 1745-8552
ER -
ID: 291533828