The “mesh” as evidence – model comparison and alternative interpretations of feedback
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › Communication
Standard
The “mesh” as evidence – model comparison and alternative interpretations of feedback. / Hulme, Oliver James; Whiteley, Louise Emma.
In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 30, 2007.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › Communication
Harvard
Hulme, OJ & Whiteley, LE 2007, 'The “mesh” as evidence – model comparison and alternative interpretations of feedback', Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 30.
APA
Hulme, O. J., & Whiteley, L. E. (2007). The “mesh” as evidence – model comparison and alternative interpretations of feedback. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30.
Vancouver
Hulme OJ, Whiteley LE. The “mesh” as evidence – model comparison and alternative interpretations of feedback. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2007;30.
Author
Bibtex
@article{7d06c23ac3564ef4abd832459b020a71,
title = "The “mesh” as evidence – model comparison and alternative interpretations of feedback",
author = "Hulme, {Oliver James} and Whiteley, {Louise Emma}",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The “mesh” as evidence – model comparison and alternative interpretations of feedback
AU - Hulme, Oliver James
AU - Whiteley, Louise Emma
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
M3 - Comment/debate
VL - 30
JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences
JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences
SN - 0140-525X
ER -
ID: 40325147